HOME arrow FEATURES arrow Scientific Revolution
9
May
11:46 AM
advertisement

Transitions

What do you prefer?
 

This Month's Magazine

Fitness Philanthropies

A number of charitable organizations offer programs where you can train and compete for a cause.

full story

Kidding Around

I consider myself the ultimate Auntie.

full story

Gear Check

Check out our picks this month of great gear for all of your sporty pursuits.

full story

The Long Haul

Do your non-cycling friends think you’re overly ambitious (or insane) when you tell them you’re going to ride 100 miles in a day?

full story

advertisement

Scientific Revolution

Written by: David Vranicar
(0 votes)
Posted: Thursday, 27 March 2008

With little black sensors stuck to her body, cords snaking all around her, and infrared cameras zeroed in on her every movement, Katie O’Connell could pass as a character in The Matrix. At the very least, she doesn’t look like she is about to hop on her bicycle. 

But at retül studios in Denver, the art of bike fitting has taken on a sci-fi feel. And as O’Connell saddles up on her bike, old-fashioned ideas about how to fit a bike to its rider have never seemed older.

Franko Vatterott, Todd Carver and Cliff Simms are rewriting the rules of the “art” of bike fitting. They have traded the tape measures and guesswork of yesteryear for their high-tech, down-to-the-millimeter system, retül.

The trio, which opened the studio three months ago, claims that retül is the answer to one of the biggest problems in bike fitting: in the past, measurements would almost always vary.

“No one is speaking a common language,” Vatterott says. “If five different fitters fit someone with tape measures, you’re going to get five different numbers. But if you get five guys using retül, all of those numbers are going to be within a millimeter. That’s creating this common language to help all of these elite fitters communicate.”

Of course, constructing a universal language for bike fitters to speak is as tricky as tape measures are simple.          

Riders like O’Connell are fitted with a string of sensors that are attached along a six-foot cord. The sensors are placed at points from the heel to hip to wrist. No bigger than a quarter, these LEDs (light emitting diodes) give off an infrared light that is invisible to the eye.

But the light isn’t totally invisible. While people can’t see anything, three infrared cameras are picking up everything. Everything, down to the angle of the rider’s armpit to the wrist’s relation to the hip to the exact path the knee is taking. The data is then interpreted and spit out by computer software specifically designed for the fitting system.

The computers and invisible beams of light may seem like overkill. But according to Simms, the chief inventor of the system, being able to record information while the cyclist is riding is what sets retül apart. With other increasingly outdated methods of fitting, riders are stationary, trying to simulate their riding posture. This bothered Simms because if the rider is static while adjustments are being made, what happens when they start moving?

“You miss subtle movements when you take static measurements,” says Simms, who has a master’s degree in biomechanics. “There are measurements that we do that actually take into account the movements of the rider. What is the knee lateral movement? What’s the hip rock taking place? All of those measurements are unquantifiable if you’re static.”

O’Connell was not at all static as she churned away on her bike in the retül studio, held in place on a platform that uses yet more gadgets to measure output in watts and miles per hour.

While O’Connell was riding, the retül system was able to pinpoint problems with the way that her bike fit her. At the bottom of each revolution of the pedals, O’Connell’s ankle wasn’t extending enough. In retül language, her “ankle angle” was 98 degrees. After some minor adjustments, that was increased to 131 degrees. Her knees were also jutting forward of her ankle by eight millimeters; a slight tweak of the pedals dropped it to three millimeters.

To the naked eye, the adjustments seem minuscule and irrelevant. But O’Connell noticed the changes immediately.

“I wasn’t using as much energy,” she says, “but I was still able to produce more power. There’s a huge difference.”

Those differences are instantly calculated by computer software and flashed on a flat-screen monitor. The pre-adjustment trial showed that O’Connell was producing 135 watts and cruising at 13 mph. After the changes, she was doing 171 watts and 16 mph, exerting less energy but still generating more power.

Carver wants to show cyclists just how much of a difference these adjustments make because, according to him, it’s not something that everyone thinks about.

“A lot of people don’t know how much their knees are going in or out or if their hips aren’t aligned properly,” Carver says. “They don’t think about it, and that’s where they’re losing a lot of power.”        

The retül group isn’t done advancing the science of bike fitting. They hope to eventually include physiological data like heart rate and breathing patterns to make their system even more precise.

But even though retül is still evolving, Vatterott, Simms and Carver are confident that they have the best way for cyclists to maximize their potential on their bikes.

And for those skeptical about all this technology, there’s always the tape measure.

For more on retül, visit www.retul.com. A fit session lasts about 90 minutes and costs $249.

 

The following offer retül-specific bike fits:

Green Mountain Sports, Lakewood. 303-987-8758.  www.greenmountainsports.com

Carmichael Training Systems, Colorado Springs. 866-355-0645. www.trainright.com

Boulder Cycle Sport, Boulder. 303-444-2453. www.bouldercyclesport.com


 

Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Tooty Piotr - Confused ?   | | 05.06.2008
Am I confused? If you're exerting 135 watts to go 13 MPH you're getting 1 MPH per 10.38 watts spent/produced. If you're using 171 watts to go 16 MPH you've raised slightly to 10.6875. So, you're actually less efficient. What am I missing?
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.